Public NoticesThis page houses relevant Public Notices

  • Home
  • Public Notices

Subscribe! to our Newsletter

This page houses relevant Public Notices to provide constructive notice to all concerned parties and evidentiary continuity of the record.

This Public Notices Page is an active, current collection of Ledgers of Record ™. 

The Ledger of Record ™ for a given matter is a continuously updated digital repository and record of all instruments relevant to the matter, its context, or any proceedings involving it — including, but not limited to, notices, declarations, affidavits, letters and other communications (such as, but not limited to, emails, phone calls, fax cover sheets and faxes, and in-person discussions) formalized or memorialized on the Public Notices Page, and thereby form a part of the Ledger of Record ™ of that matter.

These communications have been issued by a party with long-standing international technical, telecommunications, and intellectual property consulting experience, as well as research, academic, teaching, and industry experience [more here]

 

Table of Notices

 
Section # of Notices Last Notice # Last Updated
Steward's Message 🎥 5 video segments N/A 08/04/2025 05:24 AM PST
Owner/PM 🔗 12 OWN-012 07/28/2025 10:30 AM PST
Forum (“Court”) 🔗 11 FRM-011 08/27/2025 03:51 PM PST
Enforcement (Sheriff) 🔗 8 ENF-008 08/27/2025 03:51 PM PST

 

 

Steward's Message : A Reflection and Record

Ground Truth from the Steward

A calm, spontaneous recounting of what unfolded, how it all evolved, and why this page exists. This was recorded informally as a time-capsule of my journey, while cutting & styling my hair in my backyard. Now that it’s relevant, it’s shared as a real-time reflection and organic chronicle of what unfolded.

Video Segment Index 

  STW-001. Segment 1 🔗 6-Months in Flow, the “Unlawful Detainer” “default”, and the Sheriff’s Role in “Eviction”.  Transcript    

  STW-002. Segment 2 🔗 2.5 Years of Stewardship: From Vision to Reality. Transcript

  STW-003. Segment 3 🔗 Missing Inspection Report, Owner/PM MIA for 5+ Months, the March 12 Notice. Transcript

  STW-004. Segment 4 🔗 From Trespass, Threats, Triggers, to “UD” Filing – The March to May Timeline. Transcript 

  STW-005. Segment 5 🔗 The Unlawful & Illegal “Unlawful Detainer”, Why I Care about Homes I Rent — Because “That’s How You [I] Roll!”. Transcript 

For the full transcript of all 5 segments, click here.

 

 

Owner/Property Manager

Note: EVERY written Notice below (seven (7) in total) was sent Certified Mail with Signature Confirmation, and was received and signed for by the Property Manager/Gratia Realty, and remains unaddressed OR was directly posted on the property, and was seen by the agents/representatives of Gratia Realty/Owner, or seen directly by the Owner and his Counsel.

0. README - The Purpose of this Archive, July 23, 2025. PDF

  OWN‑001. First Written Notice to Gratia Realty/Jessica Liao and Owner (Ravi Korlimarla), January, 8, 2025.  PDF

  OWN‑002. Second Written Notice to Gratia Realty/Jessica Liao and Owner, March 6, 2025. PDF

  OWN‑003. Third Written Notice to Gratia Realty/Jessica Liao and Owner, March 9, 2025. PDF

  OWN‑004. Fourth Written Notice to Gratia Realty/Jessica Liao and Owner, March 12, 2025. PDF

  OWN‑005. Oral Notice to Gratia Realty/Jessica Liao and Owner, March 13, 2025. 

(Via an unscheduled serviceman sent at about 4pm, without permission or prior appointment, under the pretext of responding to maintenance issues from 5 months or more ago, in an attempted unlawful entry by proxy to breach the terms of set by the March 12, 2025, Notice (see Fourth Written Notice above). Timestamped video archive kept for evidentiary record.)

  OWN‑006. No Trespass Notice, April 3, 2025. PDF

(Posted after initiation of an act of trespass by Jessica Liao, on April 3, 2025 afternoon, showing up un-announced (after a nearly 5-month ghosting and complete absconding from duty, since Oct. 22, 2024), and documented in the March 6, 9, 12, 2025 Notices), disturbing privacy and peace, and, upon not being able to meet the steward, leaving an unsolicited "gift" - a plant, that was returned by USPS the next day together with the sixth and seventh two Notices.)

  OWN‑007. Fifth Written Notice to Gratia Realty/Jessica Liao and Owner: Notice for Gratia Realty and Owner, April 3, 2025. PDF

(Posted on Property, after the initiation of an act of trespass by Jessia Liao, Gratia Realty).

  OWN‑008. Sixth Written Notice to Gratia Realty/Jessica Liao and Owner: Notice of Rejection and Escalation, April 3, 2025. PDF

(This notice was included in the box used to return the unsolicited "gift" left April 3, 2025, afternoon, via an act of trespass initiated by Jessica Liao, Property Manager. This notice pointed out to the recipients that their debt accrued had exceeded “several years worth of rent”, thus providing a clear quantum of the debt, thus underscoring the subsequent rent-deductions made to recover said debt.)

  OWN‑009. Seventh Written Notice to Gratia Realty/Jessica Liao and Owner: Unsolicited Return Item Notice, April 3, 2025. PDF

(Both the sixth and seventh notices were included in the box used to return the unsolicited "gift" left April 3, 2025, afternoon, via an act of trespass initiated by Jessica Liao, Property Manager.)

  OWN‑010. Oral Notice to Gratia Realty/Owner indirectly via the Union City Police Dept. officers, April 8, 2025, during a "welfare check" at 11:45PM.

(The check was illegally and unlawfully coordinated by Gratia Realty/Owner in collusion with an estranged relative of the steward (never authorized or discussed by the steward with Gratia Realty/Owner), under the guise of being "worried" that the Steward had not responded to Gratia's repeated unlawful attempts at subverting the terms of the March 12 Notice.)

  OWN‑011. Oral Notice to Owner (Ravi Korlimarla) and Counsel (Pritpal Singh, Chigbu Law Firm), May 12, 2025.

(Given directly, in person, at the initiation of their act of trespass, by attempting entry for a "Maintenance Inspection" at about 2pm on May 12, 2025.

Note that the Inspection Report of the Maintenance Inspection conducted Oct. 22, 2024 by the Property Manager, Jessica Liao at the behest of the Owner, and required as a "must-have condition" for lease renewal by the Owner, was never provided and was still pending as of May 12, 2025 (it continues to be pending), completely nullifying the pretext of yet another “maintenance inspection.” This was despite four legally and lawfully issued Notices (see OWN-001 to OWN-004 above) asking for it and for resolution of other pending management and maintenance matters, and over 20 official communications sent/made between Oct. 2024 and Dec. 2024 which were all fully ignored).

Thus, on May 12, 2025, it was communicated, once more, that the Owner/PM were in legal and lawful default of the March 12, 2025 Notice, and that the only valid communication now was a full and complete written response to the March 12, 2025, Notice sent via Certified Mail to the address on the Notice. A response that would need to acknowledge the default, debt accrued (against which legal and lawful rent deductions announced in the March 12, 2025 Notice had commenced, starting April 2025), and would have to provide remedy & solutions for the maintenance and management issues highlighted in the March 12, 2025 Notice, some of which have been pending since Dec. 22, 2022. Timestamped video archive kept for evidentiary record.)

  OWN‑012. No Trespass Notice, Revised, July 23, 2025. PDF

 

 

Forum (“Court”)

  FRM‑001. Notice of Fatal Forum Overreach Relying on a Proven Illegal and Invalid Proof-of-Service (POS), July 10, 2025.

(This was directly conveyed to the Deputy Clerk of the “Court”, Hayward Hall of Justice, during a ~30-min phone call, July 10, 2:19pm. An invalid and illegal POS (claiming mailing by First-Class Mail instead of the required mailing by Certified Mail) implies the “case”, such as it is, has not even legally begun. Thus no jurisdiction can attach, and no response can be given nor is one needed. It is the forum’s fundamental judicial responsibility and that of all its oath-bearing staff, and that of the forum’s alone, to ensure that “service” is legally completed as per the statutes that govern their own conduct and operations. This is axiomatic; otherwise, absolutely nothing else can ever (nor should it ever) proceed.)

  FRM‑002. Declaration and Public Notice to Forum by Dr. Vishal Sharma and Associated Cover Letter, PDF, First CCD Drop-Off at Dept. 511, July 29, 2025, PDF

  FRM‑003. Declaration and Public Notice to Forum by Dr. Vishal Sharma and Associated Cover Letter, PDF, Second CCD Drop-Off at Dept. 511, July 29, 2025, PDF

  FRM‑004. Declaration and Public Notice to Forum by Dr. Vishal Sharma, July 28, 2025, PDF (Docketed July 30, 2025). PDF

  FRM‑005. Cover Letter for “Declaration and Public Notice to Forum by Dr. Vishal Sharma”, July 28, 2025, PDF (Docketed July 30, 2025)

  FRM‑006. Declaration and Public Notice to Forum by Dr. Vishal Sharma and Associated Cover Letter, July 28, 2025, PDF, Third CCD Drop-Off (Docketed and Conformed Copy) at Dept. 511 July 30, 2025, PDF

  FRM‑007. Notice of Non-Existent “Case”, Docketed Declaration with Material Facts Altering the Fundamental Basis of the “Case”, and Illegal & Unlawful Forum Outreach Requiring Interfacing with the Forum for Self-Preservation, July 30, 2025

(This was directly conveyed to the Deputy Clerk of the “Court”, Abigail Castaneda, Hayward Hall of Justice, during a 21-min phone call, July 30, 2025, at 2:42pm.

The entire premise of the Notice on July 10 was re-iterated, and that now it was also underscored by the forum’s own denial of the “initiating party’s” “Request for Entry of Default” twice, on July 21, 2025 and on July 22, 2025, for reasons of a “defective” POS, proving unequivocally that the forum recognized (as it should have) that the “service” itself was invalid and illegal; hence, never done.

Thus, no “case” could even begin, and the forum had no basis to even contact the Steward, let alone proceed towards issuing “default judgement.” Thus, even though the Steward had no responsibility to do absolutely anything, he still had to interface with the forum to inform it about its (illegal and unlawful) outreach by its continued persistence to proceed, in light of known facts reiterated via the Steward’s Declaration with the forum (see FRM-002-FRM-006 above). Ms. Castaneda, however, said that they “don’t look at Declarations.”

Furthermore, the Steward put the forum on notice to caution them that their action of issuing “default” if carried through, would lead to the complete disruption of his life by potentially having him thrown out of his own home and work place, without any basis whatsoever, which he noted was “serious business”. Whereupon Ms. Castaneda replied “I understand.”)

  FRM‑008. Notice of No “Service” and No “Case”, and Docketed July 30th Declaration, August 7, 2025

(This was directly told to Clerk Amber, during a 7-min phone-call, August 7, 2025, 2:47PM, where the Steward explained that since “service” was never done, there was no “case”. Further that the “initiating party”, such as it is, would, in the light of their “defective” POS, now have to perform “service” – posting and mailing via Certified Mail, from the start.

Clerk Amber agreed but said that he would have to “respond.” When the Steward explained that despite no obligation to do so, his Declaration dated July 28, 2025 was already on the docket as of July 30, 2025, and was now required to be studied by the forum, Clerk Amber immediately disconnected the call with “I will not discuss this.”)

  FRM‑009. Notice of the Forum’s Dereliction of Duty: Prioritizing Technicalities to Assist a Fatally Disqualified “Initiating Party”, While Ignoring Material Facts That Obliterate the Basis of the So-Called “Case” — Including the Forum’s Own Disqualification, August 26, 2025.

(This was directly conveyed to Clerk Esther, during an 18-min phone call, August 26, 2025, 2:47PM.

Clerk Esther was told by the Steward, that the fact that the forum, as late as August 25, 2025, was still “denying” the “Request for Entry of Default” from the “initiating party” based on mere technicalities, was proof that the Declaration dated July 28, 2025 and docketed on July 30th (referenced as the July 30 Declaration), had clearly not been looked at by the forum (even as it entertained the second such request after July 30, 2025, and after the additional Notice already given to the forum on July 30, 2025 itself; see FRM-007), since the material facts referenced in that Declaration change the very basis of the “case” to even exist,and would have lead to its termination.

Other notable facts were:

  1. Clerk Esther stated that being named a “defendant” makes one a “defendant”, not acknowledging the fundamental legal principle/axiom that one cannot even be a candidate to be a “defendant” until at least proper “service” as defined in the statutes, that govern and bind the forum’s operation and make it duty-bound to ascertain, verify, and confirm that “service” as claimed by the “initiating party”, such as it is, did indeed happen, and happened strictly as per their governing statutes. [This same fallacy was also echoed by Deputy Clerk of the Court, Abigail Castaneda, on July 10, 2025; see FRM-001 above.]
  2. She also immediately sought to ask the Steward, if he had “answered the complaint” and that she was not talking of a declaration. This, despite the Steward informing her that the July 30 Declaration with material facts was already on the docket since July 30, 2025.
  3. She then confirmed that a new Proof-of-Service (POS 010) dated August 18, 2025, was accepted and entered into the docket by the forum on August 18, 2025 and again on August 19, 2025. This POS stated (under penalty of perjury, obviously, as that is what a POS 010 requires) that the required documents were posted on the property on July 31st at 1:54PM and mailed via Certified Mail # 9589 0710 5270 3235 5522 73. Upon the Steward re-stating this saying that the “initiating party” claimed it was posted on July 31st and also mailed on July 31st, Clerk Esther did clarify “It doesn’t mean it’s right, I’m just telling you what the dates are on the actual POS.”
  4. We note here that the forum’s own “order” for alternative service, available for all to verify in the, now publicly available Case File (by anyone asking the forum for it and willing to pay the copy charges; “Case” 25CV124474), orders that the POS be submitted within 10 days of mailing, which was clearly not the case for the POS the forum accepted on August 18 and again on August 19, 2025, in violation of its own enabling “order.”
  5. We further note that this automatically means that both, the “initiating party” and the forum, recognized the fact that the original “service” claimed per the original POS, dated June 30th, 2025 was illegal and invalid and thus, never occurred. This means that at least as of August 18, 2025, there was absolutely no “case” because without the forum having basic information that would allow it to even be in a position to verify whether “service” had been properly completed, the “case” cannot begin. Since the “case” had not ever reached a point where it could even begin, all of the forum’s activities in this matter at least up to that point, were thus unlawful, illegal, and, given the grievous and devastating implications of the “default judgement” the forum was overseeing and the threat and coercion of the clear and present danger of “default” it effects in all interactions with the Steward and his company Metanoia Innovations, Inc., clearly also criminal.
  6. Clerk Esther then confirmed that on August 25, 2025, the “initiating party” filed a (fourth) “Request for Entry of Default” via Clerk’s Judgement, but that “we could not enter a judgement against you because they missed some things on their paperwork.” And, so “we couldn’t do the judgement because the default was rejected.”
  7. She also clarified that the forum, “we”, “told them their mistakes, they resubmitted it today, but we have not processed it yet.”
  8. When the Steward asked Clerk Esther what the clerk’s denial of the August 25, 2025, request for entry of default stated, Clerk Esther refused to give that public information to the Steward, of all people, who is particularly entitled to it, stating she did not need to go into detail and that that was their personal paperwork that they missed and they had to correct and resubmit it. She did specify that “they were sent the information that they needed to complete, in order to make this [their request for default] a legally-binding document.”
  9. When the Steward requested the name of the Court Clerk that rejected the August 25 request for default, Clerk Esther stated “I'm not really sure if I need to give you that information sir. It was rejected because the paperwork was incorrect and they resubmitted it. Right. We don't want you calling the clerk that processed it,” but upon being reminded that it is already in the docket and public, she agreed to provide it with the provisio that the Steward not call that clerk directly, which he had never even hinted at.
  10. When the Steward asked how the forum verified whether the information in the second POS and their “Request for Entry of Default” was even correct, Clerk Ether, repeated three times “we’re trained to do that sir, we’re trained todo that, we’re trained to look at paperwork” and that “we do not enter a judgement against anybody if the correct paperwork is not presented to us.” The Steward notes that this directly and fully contradicts the statement under item c) above.
  11. Clerk Esther also added “So, what I'm telling you is the clerk could not default you because the plaintiff didn't have all the correct paperwork in order.” and upon the Steward stating that it was not a matter or paperwork, but whether the “service” even happened (as per the governing and binding statutes), because if “service” did not happen, all the paperwork is not going to help.
  12. To this Clerk Esther stated that “the way we’re looking at it, they have the paperwork served. I know you are saying you weren’t served, but they’re saying you are. So, we’re going by what we see in front of us.” Which again directly contradicts both item c) and item j) above, to catastrophic effect all around - for the forum, for the “initiating party” and, of course, for the Steward and his company Metanoia Innovations, Inc., who the forum has no basis to even contact, but upon whom they are willing to wreak (with no legitimate or lawful or any other, basis whatsoever) the havoc of “default” and “eviction.”
  13. Also, Clerk Esther first stated that the rejection of request for default on August 25, 2025, could have been due to the July 30 Declaration because “you did submit your declaration, so that’s going to stand, we’re not overlooking that” but that since she did not process the paperwork she did not know.
  14. Upon being informed again of the July 30 Declaration obliterating the basis of the “case” to exist, she said that “what’s in the declaration should be an answer” and that what should have taken place was an “answer” letting the “court” know “what’s been going on, what happened”, which is exactly what the July 30 Declaration (see FRM-004) is. )

  FRM‑010. Notice of Liability to Forum and All Involved for Dereliction, Trespass, and Material Suppression, August, 26, 2025.

(This was delivered via a voicemail to Melaine Williams, Supervisor of Clerks of the forum, upon being transferred by Clerk Esther, August 26, 2025, approx 3:10PM.

  • For a video of the Steward leaving the message as Steward and Secretary, Metanoia Innovations, Inc. (in his distinct personal and professional capacities), click here.
  • For a transcript of the message of the Steward as Steward and as Secretary, Metanoia Innovations, Inc. (in his distinct personal and professional capacities), that was left, click here.

This Notice covered the following key facts:

  1. The July 30 Declaration has material facts that obliterate the basis of the “case”, and these facts explain the fatal disqualification of the “initiating party” and the forum. The “initiating party” from prior dishonored legal and lawful agreements, legal breaches, etc. and the forum, among others, for dereliction in its fundamental duty to verify that a party is qualified to seek the forum’s assistance, and it not itself fatally disqualified from doing so.
  2. Given the technicalities used to reject the “Request for Entry of Default” on August 25, 2025, it is clear that the forum has not looked at the July 30 Declaration, and is proceeding blindly in the absence of material facts already before it, in its docket.
  3. Even the Proof-of-Service presented on August 18, 2025 and August 19, 2025 is a perjury because, unlike what was sworn to under oath on the second POS 010 form, no posting of the required papers was made on the property on July 31st.
  4. This is fully undermined by the fact that on August 23, 2025, they made a posting on the property, which is fully documented in continuous, videographic and photographic evidence, as to the manner of posting, the contents of the sheaf of papers posted. There would be absolutely no need to do so, if the “service” claimed to have been done on July 31, 2025 was valid and legal.
  5. Even the papers posted on August 23,2025, are irrelevant, invalid, and illegal (not to mention an act of trespass, against prominently posted notices and associated commercial terms), as they do not include the enabling “order” from the court, a fundamental prerequisite for posted paperwork to even qualify as the posting component of “posting and mailing” that are required to be done concurrently, or mailing forthwith after the posting. Rather, they include orders for a completely different, unrelated case, 25CV124494 instead of 25CV124474.
  6. Therefore, everything else notwithstanding, you are put, personally, professionally, every single member involved in the forum, personally and professionally on notice as to why the forum continues to proceed to create destruction, devastation and complete annihilation of the life, living, livelihood and operations of both me and my company, Metanoia Innovations, Inc., despite material facts that have been sitting with the forum and have been explained multiple times, even though I have no obligation to do so, because I'm not a “defendant” until the statutes that bind and govern your conduct and operations have been followed properly to “serve” me properly.
  7. The forum seems to be proceeding in the direction of so-called “default,” which can completely upend my life, and in complete ignorance of material facts that obliterate the basis of the “case”, so issuing “default” is a far cry.
  8. A formal response in writing is required from the forum, as to why you are doing that (Item 7) in writing. And everybody has been now put on notice that you would all be professionally, personally, jointly and severally, liable for illegal activity and unlawful activity and, potentially, criminal activity. )

  FRM‑011. Notice of Declaration and Facts Obliterating Basis for “Actions”/“Judgements,” August 27, 2025, Emailed and Certified Mailed to Dept. 511, Hayward Hall of Justice, August 27, 2025.

 

 
 

Enforcement (Sheriff)

  ENF‑001. Notice Against Harm By Unlawful Enforcement, July 23, 2025. PDF

(For any man, woman or entity purporting any enforcement authority to unlawfully and illegally, effect "eviction" or any related action(s) based upon fraudulent "orders", from a forum that itself is fatally disqualified, and an "initiating party" that has no standing or grounds to invoke *any* forum, without first curing at least its own lawful default, legal breaches, procedural malfeasance, abuse of forum and its process, among other disqualifications.)

  ENF‑002. Add On to Notice Against Harm by Unlawful Enforcement, July 24, 2025. PDF

  ENF‑003. Lawful Self-Protection Letter and Notice to Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez of Alameda County, California, July 24, 2025. PDF

(Self-protection action in anticipation of unlawful and illegimate eviction enforcement attempt initiated by disqualified parties and defective filings. Issued under lawful necessity, in response to known disqualifications and falsified filings, to prevent trespass and irreparable harm.)

[NOTE: Property location redacted from public version for privacy and personal safety of the steward. Unredacted copy has been lawfully served to the relevant parties.]

  ENF‑004. Notice of Criminal Tresspas and Wrongful Enforcement, July 25, 2025 PDF

(Deputy S. White was noticed that the Steward was calling to notify the Sheriff’s Dept. that a formal notice of Criminal Trespass and Wrongful Enforcement addressed to Sheriff Sanchez had already been sent via Certified Mail on July 24, 2025, and had been emailed July 25, 2025, and was, per the Delivery Status Report, in their email system.

This call was to ensure that no one proceeds with any eviction attempt or on-premise posting activity, especially while serious procedural violations, including proofs-of-service and lack of jurisdiction, were at issue. This call was being made to ensure that the Sherrif’s Dept and its staff did not become complicit in a criminal action, because the personnel involved may not be aware of the legal danger they are in by enforcing an invalid writ.

The Steward also noticed Deputy White that merely receiving the July 24 Notice was not enough, and that it needed to be read and understood. To ensure that this Notice and future notices are not sent to an email address that is not regularly monitored, the Steward obtained the direct email address of Deputy White so she could be noticed, in addition to direct notices to Sheriff Sanchez and her office.)

  ENF‑005. Notice of Declaration and Facts Obliterating Basis for “Actions”/“Judgements,” August 27, 2025, Emailed to Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez, Alameda County, August 27, 2025.

  ENF‑006. Notice of Declaration and Facts Obliterating Basis for “Actions”/“Judgements,” August 27, 2025, Mailed via USPS Certified Mail to Sheriff Yesenia Sanchez, Alameda County, August 27, 2025.

  ENF‑007. Notice of Declaration and Facts Obliterating Basis for “Actions”/“Judgements,” August 27, 2025, Emailed to deputy S. White, Office of the Sheriff, Alameda County, August 27, 2025.

  ENF‑008. Notice of Declaration and Facts Obliterating Basis for “Actions”/“Judgements,” August 27, 2025, Mailed via USPS Certified Mail to to deputy S. White, Office of the Sheriff, Alameda County, August 27, 2025.

 

 

This page is maintained as a lawful, timestamped, and transparent ledger of notices issued by Dr. Vishal Sharma, Founder of Metanoia, Inc., with 25+ years of international consulting in telecom, IP strategy, and systems design. Additional details available at: About the Expert, Metanoia Inc., LinkedIn, and Resume.

 

This archive auto-updates for lawful record-keeping and third-party analysis.

Metadata associated with these files is monitored for tampering attempts.